House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries is facing a growing storm inside his own party as dozens of House Democrats decline to publicly commit to backing him for another term as their leader, according to multiple reports and congressional sources familiar with private discussions.

The hesitation marks the first significant crack in Democratic unity since Jeffries succeeded former Speaker Nancy Pelosi, raising new questions about his ability to hold together an increasingly fractured caucus amid ongoing budget battles, a government shutdown, and discontent over messaging strategy.

Several moderate and progressive members have privately voiced concern that Jeffries’ leadership has been “too reactive” and “overly focused on Trump” rather than offering a clear alternative vision for voters ahead of the next election.

“There’s fatigue,” said one Democratic lawmaker from a swing district, speaking anonymously to Politico. “People respect Hakeem, but there’s frustration that we’re constantly on defense, constantly responding to Republicans, instead of leading with ideas that connect with working families.”

Another source added that a number of first-term Democrats and members of the Congressional Progressive Caucus have floated the idea of exploring “fresh leadership options” should Jeffries fail to unite the party by early next year.

While no serious challenger has yet emerged, insiders suggest that Reps. Pramila Jayapal (D-WA) and Abigail Spanberger (D-VA) have both been mentioned in private conversations as potential alternatives — representing two distinct ideological poles within the party.

For now, Jeffries’ allies are dismissing the speculation as “routine noise.”

“Every caucus has chatter,” said Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA), the third-ranking House Democrat. “Leader Jeffries has earned overwhelming respect. He’s navigated us through multiple shutdown fights and unified Democrats when it mattered most.”

But privately, aides acknowledge growing concern over what one staffer described as “a credibility gap” between leadership rhetoric and voter priorities. Recent polling by the Pew Research Center found that only 28% of Americans can identify a single Democratic legislative accomplishment this year — a troubling statistic as the party gears up for what’s expected to be a brutal 2026 midterm election.

Critics inside the caucus argue that Jeffries’ leadership style — modeled after Pelosi’s disciplined, top-down structure — has alienated some younger lawmakers who want a more open, grassroots approach.

“We’ve got talented people who feel unheard,” said one Democratic strategist. “Jeffries is smart and capable, but he needs to show he can inspire, not just organize.”

Tensions also flared after Jeffries reportedly clashed with several members of the Progressive Caucus over his handling of the recent Israel-Gaza ceasefire debate. Some Democrats felt he was too aligned with President Biden’s cautious stance, while others accused him of sidelining voices calling for a stronger humanitarian response.

“It’s hard to lead when your caucus spans from democratic socialists to conservative moderates,” said Dr. Elaine Kamarck, a political analyst at the Brookings Institution. “Pelosi managed that balance through sheer force of will. Jeffries hasn’t yet shown that same command.”

Adding to the pressure, Democratic fundraising totals have dipped for the second consecutive quarter — a sign, some insiders say, of waning enthusiasm among small donors and grassroots organizers. Several key swing-district candidates have already begun running more independent campaigns, distancing themselves from national party leadership.

Republicans, meanwhile, are watching closely. House Speaker Mike Johnson used the reports of Democratic disarray to take a jab during a recent press conference. “Democrats can’t even decide who’s in charge,” Johnson said. “Maybe that’s why they can’t get anything done.”

Still, many senior Democrats are urging calm, noting that intra-party debate is healthy. “We went through this before with Pelosi, with Schumer, even with Obama,” said Rep. Jim Clyburn (D-SC). “Disagreement doesn’t mean division — it means people care about getting things right.”

For now, Jeffries is staying silent on the rumored dissent, focusing instead on the government funding negotiations and a series of upcoming policy rollouts aimed at addressing cost-of-living pressures and healthcare reform.

Yet behind the scenes, his team is reportedly reaching out to wavering members in what one aide described as a “listening campaign” designed to rebuild confidence before next year’s leadership elections.

“Jeffries knows what’s at stake,” said a senior Democratic staffer. “He’s not taking this lightly — he’s calling people personally, having the hard conversations. But make no mistake: the knives are out, and everyone’s watching who moves first.”

Whether the tension fizzles or explodes into a full-blown leadership challenge may depend on what happens over the next few months — and whether Jeffries can convince an increasingly restless caucus that he’s still the right person to lead Democrats into the future.