Former FBI Director Christopher Wray is reportedly under federal investigation for alleged obstruction of justice, false statements, and mishandling of classified materials, according to The Wall Street Journal. The wide-ranging probe, which sources say has expanded into multiple jurisdictions, centers on Wray’s conduct during the later years of the Biden administration and his handling of politically sensitive matters—including the Durham investigation into the origins of the Trump–Russia probe.

Federal investigators have issued subpoenas to several former senior FBI officials, signaling the inquiry’s seriousness. According to officials familiar with the matter, prosecutors are examining whether Wray or members of his leadership team destroyed or concealed evidence tied to the Durham investigation. Among the most alarming claims are reports of “burn bag” use on the FBI’s seventh floor—an area reserved for top leadership—where documents may have been improperly shredded or destroyed.

Sources told CNN that forensic teams are now analyzing whether the materials in question were classified and if any of the destruction violated federal recordkeeping or obstruction laws. If confirmed, the findings could mark one of the most damaging internal scandals in the bureau’s modern history.

The investigation also reportedly touches on Wray’s testimony before Congress regarding foreign election interference. In both 2020 and 2021, Wray assured lawmakers that the FBI had not identified a coordinated foreign effort to manipulate mail-in ballots during the presidential election. However, a recently declassified FBI report—turned over by current Director Kash Patel—suggests otherwise. The document allegedly indicates that Chinese operatives produced counterfeit U.S. driver’s licenses to facilitate fraudulent voter registrations and mail-in ballot submissions.

Critics argue that this revelation directly contradicts Wray’s sworn testimony and raises serious questions about whether Congress was misled. Lawmakers from both parties have called for transparency, with several Republican committee chairs demanding that Wray be subpoenaed to testify once more.
Wray’s tenure has also come under renewed scrutiny for his handling of the “radical-traditionalist Catholic” memo—a 2023 internal FBI document that categorized certain Catholic groups as potential domestic terrorism threats. Wray dismissed the memo at the time, claiming it originated from a single rogue field office and was swiftly retracted. But subsequent findings revealed that the memo had, in fact, been circulated to over 1,000 FBI employees and reviewed by senior officials in multiple field divisions, contradicting Wray’s earlier public statements.

Since taking office, Director Kash Patel has reportedly launched a sweeping overhaul of the FBI’s leadership and operational policies. Patel, a former Trump administration official known for his work in intelligence reform, has already terminated several high-ranking officials, severed ties with activist organizations such as the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC), and initiated financial audits targeting networks suspected of funding extremist political activity.

Inside the Bureau, morale is said to be strained. Current and former agents describe a “deep institutional reckoning” as the new leadership attempts to restore credibility while distancing itself from controversies that plagued the agency in recent years. “There’s a clear effort to clean house,” said one former field agent. “But the fact that the investigation has reached Wray himself is something nobody saw coming.”

As of this week, Christopher Wray has not publicly commented on the allegations or the ongoing investigation. His legal representatives have also declined requests for interviews.

If the probe confirms any of the allegations, it could reshape public trust in the FBI and reignite debates over how the agency handles political investigations. For now, the case remains under review, but its implications are already reverberating through Washington’s power corridors—raising difficult questions about accountability, transparency, and the politicization of America’s top law enforcement institution.